Partial breast irradiation: An updated consensus statement from the American brachytherapy society

PurposeIn recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques.MethodsMembers of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed.ResultsThe majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age >45 years with tumor size <3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion.ConclusionsThis updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.     

Women-Focused Cardiovascular Rehabilitation: An International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guideline

Women-focused cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR; phase II) aims to better engage women, and might result in better quality of life than traditional programs. This first clinical practice guideline by the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR) provides guidance on how to deliver women-focused programming. The writing panel comprised experts with diverse geographic representation, including multidisciplinary health care providers, a policy-maker, and patient partners. The guideline was developed in accordance with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealTh care (RIGHT). Initial recommendations were on the basis of a meta-analysis. These were circulated to a Delphi panel (comprised of corresponding authors from review articles and of programs delivering women-focused CR identified through ICCPR’s audit; N = 76), who were asked to rate each on a 7-point Likert scale in terms of impact and implementability (higher scores positive). A Web call was convened to achieve consensus; 15 panelists confirmed strength of revised recommendations (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE]). The draft underwent external review from CR societies internationally and was posted for public comment. The 14 drafted recommendations related to referral (systematic, encouragement), setting (model choice, privacy, staffing), and delivery (exercise mode, psychosocial, education, self-management empowerment). Nineteen (25.0%) survey responses were received. For all but 1 recommendation, ≥ 75% voted to include; implementability ratings were < 5/7 for 4 recommendations, but only 1 for effect. Ultimately 1 recommendation was excluded, 1 separated into 2 and all revised (2 substantively); 1 recommendation was added. Overall, certainty of evidence for the final recommendations was low to moderate, and strength mostly strong. These recommendations and associated tools can support all programs to feasibly offer some women-focused programming.     

Alanine transaminase is predominantly increased in the active phase of anti-HMGCR myopathy

Autoantibodies against 3?hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and the signal recognition particle (SRP) are representative antibodies causing immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM), called as anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP myopathies, respectively. Here, we analyzed the differences in routine blood test results between 56 anti-HMGCR and 77 anti-SRP myopathy patients. A higher alanine transaminase (ALT) level and a lower aspartate transaminase (AST)/ALT ratio were observed in anti-HMGCR myopathy patients [ALT, 265.7 ± 213.3 U/L (mean ± standard deviation); AST/ALT ratio, 0.88 ± 0.32] than in anti-SRP-myopathy patients (ALT, 179.3 ± 111.2 U/L, p < 0.05; AST/ALT ratio, 1.28 ± 0.40, p < 0.01). In the active phase, anti-HMGCR myopathy often showed ALT predominance, whereas anti-SRP myopathy often showed AST predominance. In addition, there were differences in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), total cholesterol (TChol) level, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level between anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP myopathies (ESR: HMGCR, 24.4 ± 20.8 mm/1 h; SRP, 35.7 ± 26.7 mm/1 h, p = 0.0334; TChol: HMGCR, 226.7 ± 36.6 mg/dL; SRP, 207.6 ± 40.8 mg/dL, p = 0.0163; HDL: HMGCR, 58.4 ± 13.9 mg/dL; SRP, 46.2 ± 17.3 mg/dL, p < 0.01). Additional studies on the differences in routine blood test results may further reveal the pathomechanisms of IMNM.     

Defining the role of advanced care practitioners in pediatric surgery practice

IntroductionThe role of advanced care practitioners (ACPs) in pediatric surgery is increasingly important and not well described.MethodsElectronic surveys were sent to pediatric surgery division chiefs within the Children's Hospital Association.ResultsWe received 77/163 survey responses (47%). The median number of ACPs per service was 3.0 (range 0–35). ACP number correlated with inpatient census, surgeon number, case volume, trauma centers, intensive care unit status, and fellowship programs but not with presence of residents/hospitalists, hospital setting, or practice type. Nearly all programs incorporated nurse practitioners while almost half utilized physician assistants. Approximately one-third of ACPs were designated for subspecialties (35%) such as trauma and colorectal. Only 9% of centers had surgeon-specific ACPs. ACP responsibilities included both inpatient and outpatient tasks. Nearly all ACPs participated in procedures (89%), mostly bedside (80%). All ACPs worked daytime shifts, with less nights and weekends. Most ACPs billed for services (80%). Satisfaction with ACP coverage was widespread and did not correlate with ACP number. Most respondents felt that ACPs enhance, and not hinder, resident/fellow training (85%).ConclusionACPs are useful adjuncts in pediatric surgery. A better understanding of practice patterns may help optimize utilization to enhance patient care and can be used to advocate for appropriate resources.